Consideration in business law case study
Hierarchy has to be referred to when talking about the precedent, whereas not every precedent will be used in judging a new case. Promises done in advance are bound to be considered or met.
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement which the courts will enforce and it is between two or more legally distinct parties which is called a Bilateral Agreement, e.
This can be in the course of the work or after the other party has completed the work. But the offer must be accepted by the other party to form a contract. There are some similarities among these two cases and Mr. Acceptance needs to be valid and informing the offeror, while the terms should as same as the previous ones.
The police comprehended and acted, but the time for inquiring for compensation as promised, the campus proprietor denied releasing the payments claiming that the police was carrying out their normal duties. The principle was by Lord Atkin.
Case study past consideration
It can also be defined as the price that one party agrees to compensate the other binding party in order to make the agreement enforceable. Carlill bought the smoke ball and used it as directed by carbolic instructions. The business man should therefore claim for damages or seek an order for specific performance. Donoghue in the absence of any contact between them. If this is not met, then the consideration is declared past. Young, M. Revocation is the act of recall or annulment. However, agent can be regularly paid when agreement express willingness of both sides. These afore-mentioned two points will be justified by cases. Donoghue suffered personal injury as a result of shock. She took action to determine whether the manufacturing company owed her any compensation due to the injuries she suffered. The court ruled out on the consideration that the company was a promisor and Mrs Carlill was the promisee if carbolic smoke ball company had promised to give out pounds to the smoke ball users who still contacted the influenza flu.
The court finally hold that the captain is not duty to pay the extra money because the old contract is existed as there is not of additional value. Young, M.
based on 9 review