A comparison of three hamlet screen adaptations

They are seen, then, as two sides to the same revenge-driven coin, one working from without and the other within. This version, shortened to just under two hours, cuts out much of the text of the actual play.

hamlet movie 2000 vs play

Michael Richardson. A lot of details from the book were missing in the movie, but the changes made by Whales were effective as they made the movie interesting, and successful Russell Jackson.

The first difference between the three movies is what strikes the viewer immediately, the setting and time period.

Whether out of precedent, pressure, or some need to discover some complex in Hamlet, this has become a very popular trend for filmmakers As such, we are given a modern art student, fulfilling the clichd role of slacker who cannot come outside of himself enough to face the situation he is in.

The harsh and loud tones emphasize anger that matches the cruelty of his words. Zefferelli underscores his characterization of Hamlet with scenery that is impregnated with reality. These most obvious differences can be seen in each movies setting and time period, script and the manner in which the individual characters are portrayed.

His Hamlet is as unpredictable and emotional messy as I personally imagined from the text.

hamlet movie comparison worksheet

We see that from a grieving son lurking in the shadows at the start, Branagh moves to an explosive man of action in the later scene, a knowing impersonator of madness and theatrically dynamic presence Burnett Each film seemed to be on one end of the spectrum of either being closely interpreted or completely remodeled a different idea of what Hamlet is.

The Branagh version uses gas lamps for lighting and there is a pool table in Claudius's room.

Rated 10/10 based on 71 review
Comparison of Hamlet Films essays